SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(SC) 1574

ARIJIT PASAYAT, S.H.KAPADIA
Dattaraj Nathuji Thaware – Appellant
Versus
State Of Maharashtra – Respondent


Judgment

Arijit Pasayat, J.—This case is a sad reflection on members of the legal profession and is almost a black spot on the noble profession. The petitioner who belongs to this profession filed a petition styled as “Public Interest Litigation” before the Nagpur Bench of the Bombay High Court. By the impugned judgment, the High Court dismissed it holding that there was no public interest involved and in fact the petitioner had resorted to black mailing respondent Nos. 6 and 7 and was caught red handed accepting “black mailing” money. The High Court also noticed that the allegations of unauthorized constructions made in the petition were also not true.

2. Cost of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand only) which was levied, was directed to be paid to the affected respondent Nos. 6 and 7 before the High Court.

3. It is, in fact, a black day for the black robed professionals, if the allegation, as found by the High Court to be true and which presently appear to be the subject matter of further proceedings in a criminal case, are true. This will leave the members of the legal profession black faced for the black deed of the petitioner who may be as the High Court found a black sheep




























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top