SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(SC) 1615

P.P.NAOLEKAR, S.B.SINHA
Hombe Gowda Edn. Trust – Appellant
Versus
State of Karnataka – Respondent


Judgment

S.B. Sinha, J.—One Venkappa Gowda, Respondent No. 3 herein, was at all material times a lecturer in Kuvempu Mahavidyalaya, the Appellant No. 2 herein. The said institution is under the management of the Appellant No. 1.

2. The private institutions in the State of Karnataka are governed by the Karnataka Private Educational Institutions (Discipline and Control) Act, 1975, (for short, ‘the Act’).

3. The Respondent No. 3 herein was subjected to a disciplinary proceeding on an allegation that he had assaulted the Principal of Appellant No 2 with a ‘chappal’. He was found guilty of the said charge and dismissed from service. An appeal was preferred by him before the Educational Appellate Tribunal (for short, ‘the Tribunal’) in terms of Section 8 of the said Act. The said Tribunal is constituted in terms of Section 10 thereof. The proceeding before the said Tribunal by a legal fiction is treated to be a judicial proceeding. It is not in dispute that the Appellant No. 2 received grant-in-aid from the State of Karnataka in terms of the Grant-in-Aid Code framed by the Karnataka Collegiate Education Department. Before the Tribunal, the State of Karnataka as also the Director of Collegia



























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top