VIVIAN BOSE, J.

(1) THIS appeal and Civil Appeal No. 12 of 1954, which will also be governed by this judgment, raise the same points though there are some differences in the facts. We will deal with Civil Appeal No. 260 of. 1953 first.

(2) THE suit there related to an arbitration matter. The appellant before us, whom it will be convenient to call the contractor, entered into a contract with the Dominion of India through an Additional Chief Engineer of the C. P. W. D. on 1/11/1945 for the supply of bricks to the C. P. W. D" a department of the Dominion government. Disputes arose about a number of matters. Clause 14 of the agreement provide that all disputes arising out of or relating to the contract should be referred to the Superintending Engineer of the Circle for the time being. Accordingly, there was a reference on 21/1/1949 and an award followed on 8/5/1949. It was filed in the court of the Subordinate Judge, Dhanbad, and the contractor prayed Air it be accepted and that a decree be passed in terms of it. The Dominion of India filed objections under section 30 of the Arbitration Act, 1940 and prayed that the award be set aside and alternatively that