SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(SC) 918

N.P.SINGH, R.M.SAHAI
Prakash Wati – Appellant
Versus
R. L. Kapur – Respondent


(1) THESE tenants petitions are directed against the judgment and order of the Delhi High Court. One of the grounds on which the order of eviction was passed by the rent control authorities and upheld by the High Court was that the petitioners had sublet the premises. When these petitions were heard on occasion earlier and the finding recorded by the High Court on sub-tenancy was assailed both on law and facts one of the objections raised on behalf of the respondent was that the petitions were liable to be dismissed as the High Court and the rent control authorities have found it as a fact that the petitioners were guilty of committing forgery and fabricating documents. Since the objection appeared to be vital, the records from the Rent Control Officer were summoned by an order dated 5/8/1994.

(2) WE have perused the record and heard Shri P.N. Lekhi and Shri R.P. Bansal, the learned counsel for the petitioners at length. From the perusal of the partnership deed, the employees register of the hotel etc. it appears that the finding recorded by the High court and the rent control authorities that the petitioners were guilty of forgery and fabrication is well founded. Th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top