SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1993 Supreme(SC) 809

KULDIP SINGH, M.M.PUNCHHI, K.RAMASWAMY
Parsinni – Appellant
Versus
Sukhi – Respondent


Advocates:
K.K.GUPTA, S.JANANI, V.C.MAHAJAN

JUDGMENT

K. Ramaswamy, J.

1. The appellants/defendants appeal by special leave arises against the judgment and decree of the Punjab & Haryana High Court in Regular Second Appeal No. 1822 of 1973 dated Sept. 21, 1982. The respondents filed a suit for declaration of title to and for possession of 53 kanals 12 marlas from the appellants. The trial court in File No. 40 dismissed the suit. The Addl. District Judge, Barnala reversed the decree of the trial court and decreed the suit in Civil Appeal No. 121 of 1965 by judgment and decree dated November 28, 1973. The High Court confirmed the appellate decree. One Wazira Singh died surviving three sons Sukhi, Surjan and Sarwan through his first wife, Mahla Singh son and Parsinni and Chinta two minor daughters through his second wife. Wazira had died on 5.11.1984 B.K. Parsinni is the 1st defendant and Chinto died leaving behind her children defendant Nos. 2 to 5. From the evidence it would be clear that, after the death of Wazira, there was a division of the properties by metes and bounds and 53 kanals 12 marlas were left in the possession of Prasinni and Chinto for their enjoyment. The Mutation No. 1722 Ex. P-8 on 10.2.85 B.K. discloses that




Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top