1. Contempt proceedings — Non-compliance with court orders — Failure to arrest an individual. (Para 1 , 2 )
Back
Next 
1999 Supreme(SC) 526
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
VERSUS
SKIPPER CONSTRUCTION
April 19, 1999
Important Points
Acceptance of explanation for non-compliance with court orders and direction for further steps to ensure compliance and execution of pending warrants
Subject
Civil Law - Enforcement of Court Orders
Act Referred
Headnote
Commissioner of Police - Non-compliance with Court Orders - The court accepted the explanation provided by the Commissioner of Police for non-compliance with the court orders and initiated an enquiry into the circumstances. The Commissioner of Police was directed to take further steps to ensure compliance with the court orders and to execute pending warrants expeditiously.
Fact of the Case:
The Commissioner of Police provided an affidavit explaining the reasons for non-compliance with court orders. An enquiry was initiated into the circumstances of non-compliance.
Finding of the Court:
The court accepted the explanation provided by the Commissioner of Police and directed further steps to ensure compliance with court orders and execution of pending warrants.
Issues: Non-compliance with court orders, pending warrants, initiation of enquiry
Ratio Decidendi: Acceptance of explanation for non-compliance, initiation of enquiry, direction for further steps to ensure compliance and execution of pending warrants
Final Decision: The matter was listed for further report and the filing of an application by the advocate on behalf of the L. Rs. of Ratnakar was also listed for a future date.
Legal Category Hierarchy
Table of Contents
2. Police submission explaining reasons for non-compliance with previous court directions. (Para 1 )
3. Acceptance of explanation for initial non-compliance — Note of continued failure to execute arrest warrants. (Para 1 , 2 )
4. Judicial oversight of the execution of warrants and court orders to ensure compliance within contempt jurisdiction. (Para 1 , 2 )
5. Police directed to execute pending warrants and comply with court orders — Progress report required. (Para 2 , 3 )
6. May a court accept an explanation for the non-compliance of its previous orders?
Yes, the court may accept an affidavit explaining the reasons for non-compliance and may initiate an enquiry into the circumstances of such failure. (Para 1 )
7. What directions can a court issue when arrest warrants remain unexecuted?
The court can direct the police to take further steps to comply with its orders and execute all pending warrants as expeditiously as possible, requiring periodic progress reports. (Para 2 )
8. What is the procedure when an individual is arrested pursuant to orders in contempt jurisdiction?
The individual must be produced before the court so that the court can pass further orders in the matter. (Para 3 )
( 1 ) THE presence of Smt. Harpreet Kaur w/o Shri Prabhjot Singh is dispensed with for the present. An affidavit dated 16/4/1999 has been filed by the Commissioner of Police explaining the reasons as to why the earlier order of this court dated 15/3/1999 could not be complied with. We accept the explanation. We also notice that an enquiry has been initiated into the circumstances in which the earlier order of this court dated 15/3/1999 was not complied with. After the said enquiry is over, the result of the enquiry will be placed before the court.
( 2 ) IT has also been mentioned that so far as the subsequent order of this court dated 5/4/1999 is concerned efforts made so far have not resulted in the arrest of Shri Prabhjot singh. The affidavit gives a list of court cases in which Shri Prabhjot Singh is wanted and annexure b to the affidavit referred in para gives a further list of 10 cases in which shri Prabhjot Singh is involved where either investigation is pending or trial is pending. The Commissioner of Police will take further steps not only to have our order dated 5/4/1999 complied with but also take steps to see that any pending warrants issued in the various cases are executed as expeditiously as possible. A further report of the result of the investigation by the Police shall be placed before this court on 3/5/1999.
( 3 ) IN case Shri Prabhjot Singh is arrested before the next date of hearing pursuant to orders passed by this court in the contempt jurisdiction, he shall be produced in this court so that this court can pass further order in the matter. List on 3/5/1999.
( 4 ) THE I. A. filed by MR. SK Kulkarni, advocate on behalf of the L. Rs. of Ratnakar shall also be listed on 3/5/1999 along with the matters.
