SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(SC) 526

UMESH C.BANERJEE, J.JAGANNADHA RAO
Delhi Development Authority – Appellant
Versus
Skipper Construction – Respondent


( 1 ) THE presence of Smt. Harpreet Kaur w/o Shri Prabhjot Singh is dispensed with for the present. An affidavit dated 16/4/1999 has been filed by the Commissioner of Police explaining the reasons as to why the earlier order of this court dated 15/3/1999 could not be complied with. We accept the explanation. We also notice that an enquiry has been initiated into the circumstances in which the earlier order of this court dated 15/3/1999 was not complied with. After the said enquiry is over, the result of the enquiry will be placed before the court.

( 2 ) IT has also been mentioned that so far as the subsequent order of this court dated 5/4/1999 is concerned efforts made so far have not resulted in the arrest of Shri Prabhjot singh. The affidavit gives a list of court cases in which Shri Prabhjot Singh is wanted and annexure b to the affidavit referred in para gives a further list of 10 cases in which shri Prabhjot Singh is involved where either investigation is pending or trial is pending. The Commissioner of Police will take further steps not only to have our order dated 5/4/1999 complied with but also take steps to see that any pending warrants issued in the various cases are exec


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top