SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(SC) 33

G.B.PATTANAIK, M.B.SHAH
Paramjit Singh – Appellant
Versus
State (N. C. T. ) Of Delhi – Respondent


(1) LEAVE granted.

(2) THE appellant is being prosecuted for an offence under the provisions of Terrorist I and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987. He has been lingering in jail since May, 1992. His co-accused Jasbir Singh was released on bail by the learned Designated Judge on 16/8/1992. The appellant moved this Court earlier for being released on bail and by order dated 6/11/1997 this Court had dismissed the prayer with the observation that if the trial is not concluded within a reasonable time it will be open to the appellant to apply again to the Designated Court for releasing him on bail. As the trial was not concluded till May 1998 an application for bail was filed but that was rejected by the learned Designated Judge. It has been stated on affidavit that the trial of the case was fixed to several dates in May and June 1998 but the prosecution did not produce any evidence on any of the above dateS.When the matter was listed on 7/12/1998 the counsel for the Delhi Administration wanted two weeks time to file an affidavit indicating the stage of the trial. Thereafter two adjournments have been given. But it is unfortunate that no affidavit has been filed

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top