SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(SC) 437

G.B.PATTANAIK, S.P.KURDUKAR
P. K. Singh – Appellant
Versus
Bool Chand Chablani – Respondent


( 1 ) THIS appeal is directed against the order of the central Administrative tribunal, Calcutta bench dated 23/9/1993, passed in OA No. 8 of 1992 and OA No. 9 of 1992. Special leave was rejected as against OA No. 8 of 1992, but had been granted as against order in OA No. 9 of 1992. The question for consideration in this appeal is whether the service rendered by Respondents 3 to 9 on ad hoc basis prior to their regularisation by letter dated 25/10/1984 can at all be taken into account for determining their seniority in the rank of Assistant Engineer. It is not disputed that in exercise of the power conferred under Article 309 of the Constitution, the President has framed a set of Rulescalled "andaman and Nicobar (PWD) Group A and Group B Posts Recruitment Rules, 1980" (hereinafter referred to as "the Rules" ). Respondents 3 to 7 had been promoted on ad hoc basis to continue as Assistant Engineer. A Departmental Promotion Committee considered the case of regular promotion on 30/8/1982, but the said Committee found that unless and until the reserved posts are dereserved, no regular promotion can be given to the said respondents. The Departmental Promotion Committee, however, recommen




Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top