SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(SC) 820

Y.K.SABHARWAL, D.M.DHARMADHIKARI
State Of Punjab THROUGH SECRETARY, HOME – Appellant
Versus
SUBHASH KUMARS – Respondent


ORDER

1. LEAVE GRANTED.

2. BY THE IMPUGNED ORDER, THE HIGH COURT HAS QUASHED FIR NO. 55 DATED 27-4-2001. THE FIR WAS REGISTERED AGAINST FOUR RESPONDENTS FOR HAVING COMMITTED THEFT OF CHEEL LOGS FROM THE FOREST OF KUKANET. IN SUM AND SUBSTANCE, THE ALLEGATION IS OF ILLEGAL FELLING OF TREES AND THEFT OF THE SAME FROM THE FOREST. CURIOUSLY, THE HIGH COURT BY ENTERING INTO THE FACTUAL ARENA HAS PASSED THE IMPUGNED ORDER QUASHING THE FIR. SUCH A COURSE IS WHOLLY IMPERMISSIBLE. THE HIGH COURT ACTED MORE AS AN INVESTIGATING AGENCY AT A STAGE WHEN THE FIR WAS UNDER INVESTIGATION. AT THIS STAGE, WE WISH TO SAY NO MORE LEST IT MAY PREJUDICE THE PARTIES.

3. FOR THE AFORESAID REASONS, WE ALLOW THE APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDER. THE INVESTIGATION SHOULD CONTINUE IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAW.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top