B.N.AGARWAL, A.K.MATHUR
GURPREET SINGH – Appellant
Versus
State Of Punjab – Respondent
Judgment
B.N. AGRAWAL, J.- The appellants of these two appeals along with the f accused Bhajan Singh @ Harbhajan Singh and Meharban Singh were accused in a case under Section 302 of the Penal Code (for short "IPC") but as the accused Meharban Singh died during trial, the remaining three accused persons were tried and by its judgment the trial court acquitted the accused Bhajan Singh @ Harbhajan Singh whereas these two appellants were convicted under Section 302 IPC and sentenced to undergo imprisonment for 9 life and to pay a fine of Rs 2000 each, in default to undergo further imprisonment for a period of six months. Against the order of acquittal of the accused Harbhajan Singh, no appeal was filed by the State whereas on appeal being filed by the appellants, the High Court confirmed their conviction and sentence. The revision application filed by the private prosecutor for enhancement of sentence has been rejected by the High Court.
2. Prosecution case, in short, was that Kuljit Singh @ Billa was a student of BA Part I in Arya College, Ludhiana and he was a witness in a case filed for prosecution of the appellant Gurpreet Singh under Section 307 IPC which was pending. On 22-1-1990
(1955) 2 SCR 1140: AIR 1956 SC 116: 1956 Cri LJ 291. Willie (William) Slaney v. State of M.P.
(1997) 7 SCC 41 : 1997 SCC (Cri) 990: 1997 Cri LJ 4406
(1998) 6 SCC 554 : 1998 SCC (Cri) 1488. State of A.P. v. Thakkidiram Reddy
(2001) 2 SCC 577 : 2001 SCC (Cri) 358
(2001) 9 SCC 528 : 2002 SCC (Cri) 760
(1989) 3 SCC 1 : 1989 SCC (Cri) 486. Bhoop Ram v. State of U.P.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.