Back
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
N.SANTOSH HEGDE, B.P.SINGH
ABL International LTD. – Appellant
Versus
Export Credit Guarantee Corporation of India LTD. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. outline of factual history and contractual dispute between parties. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36) |
| 2. core contentions regarding writ maintainability and contract interpretation. (Para 6) |
| 3. writ jurisdiction is maintainable against state instrumentality even in contractual matters. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26) |
| 4. principles for writ maintenance in contract disputes involving state and public law elements. (Para 27 , 28) |
| 5. interpretation of addendum clauses and liability for multi-modal payment defaults. (Para 29 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51) |
| 6. justification for exercising extraordinary jurisdiction to prevent injustice due to litigation delays. (Para 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56) |
| 7. restoration of trial court order and final adjudication of the dispute. (Para 57) |
SANTOSH HEGDE, J.
( 1 ) ONE Rassik Woodworth Limited (4th respondent herein) entered into a contract with M/s. RVO Kazpishepromsyrio, a State-owned Corporation of Kazakhstan (referred to as the Kazak Corporation) for supply of 3,000 Metric tons of tea. The said agre
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
