SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(SC) 1386

Supreme Court Of India
B.P. Singh, Arun Kumar, JJ
Pohlu – Appellant
State of Haryana – Respondent
Criminal Appeals No. 936 of 1999 with No. 181 of 2002
Decided on 2/11/2004

Headnote:Appeals allowed

ORDER

1. These two appeals arise out of a common judgment and order of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh disposing of two criminal appeals, namely, Criminal Appeal No. 290-DB of 1995 and Criminal Appeal No. 336-DB of 1996. Criminal Appeal No. 936 of 1999 in this Court is preferred by Pohlu, who was the appellant in Criminal Appeal No. 290-DB of 1995, while Criminal Appeal No. 181 of 2002 is by Balwan Singh who was the appellant before the High Court in Criminal Appeal No. 336-DB of 1996.

They have been found guilty of the offence under Sections 302/34 IPC for which they have been sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life and also to pay a fine of Rs 1000 and in default to undergo six months rigorous imprisonment. They have also been found guilty of the offences under Sections 452 IPC and 323 IPC read with Section 34 IPC for which they have

been sentenced to undergo three years rigorous imprisonment and six months rigorous imprisonment respectively, apart from payment of Rs 500 and Rs 200 as fine.

2. As many as five accused persons were put for trial before the Additional Sessions Judge, Jind in Sessions Trial Case No. 310f 23-5-1995 charged variously of offences under Sections 302, 452, 323 read with Section 34 IPC. The trial court acquitted two of them, namely, Raj Kumar and Prem

Singh of all the charges levelled against them. The appellants before us were convicted by the Sessions Court which conviction has been affirmed by the High Court, as earlier noticed. The remaining accused, namely, Ishwar Singh, who was also convicted, preferred a special leave petition before this Court which was dismissed, while the appellants before us only were granted

special leave to appeal.

3. An occurrence is alleged to have taken place on 8-1-1995 at about 2.30 p.m. in Village Bakhta Khera falling within the jurisdiction of Police Station Julana. In that incident, according to the prosecution, the appellants and three others assaulted Hukam Chand, who succumbed to his injuries while being taken to the hospital, and also caused injuries to Smt Sukhdei, PW 2 who was

the daughter-in-law of the brother of the deceased, and who is the informant in the case. She lodged a report at 5.00 p.m. while admitted in the hospital at Julana on the basis of which a formal first information report (FIR) was registered at 5.45 p.m. on the same day (Exhibit PB).

4. In the FIR lodged by PW 2 it was stated that panchayat elections were held in the village on 19-12-1994 in which Hukam Chand and one Prakash

Harijan had contested. Hukam Chand was declared successful, and since the accused were the supporters of Prakash Harijan they felt aggrieved and bore a grudge against Hukam Chand. According to the informant, at about 2.30 p.m. when she was in her house she noticed that Ishwar, Balwan and Pohlu armed with lathis came towards her house hurling abuses. When she

attempted to come out of the house, Ishwar gave a lathi-blow on her head while Balwan assaulted her with lathi on her right hand and Pohlu inflicted a lathi-blow on her left arm. She raised an alarm and ran outside. She noticed deceased Hukam Chand, his son Rajinder (PW 1), Chander and Sita Ram (not examined) who were co-villagers, coming from the other side. When she reached near the village chaupal, Ishwar inflicted a lathi-blow on the head of a Hukam Chand. Though Hukam Chand was supporting a turban the injury caused on his head resulted in his falling down on the ground, whereafter appellants Balwan and Pohlu caused injuries with their respective lathis. They also caused injuries to her. Hukam Chand had become unconscious and was moved to the hospital but succumbed to his injuries on the way to the hospital. The informant was admitted for treatment. It was, therefore, alleged that Ishwar, Balwan and Pohlu had murdered Hukam Chand assaulting him with lathis on account of party rivalry, and in the process had also caused injuries to the informant. The persons named as eyewitnesses in the




























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top