SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(SC) 317

ARUN KUMAR, BRIJESH KUMAR, R.C.LAHOTI
N. MANI – Appellant
Versus
SANGEETHA THEATRE – Respondent


ORDER

1. The question of granting exemption to touring cinema within the purview of sub-rule (2) of Rule 14 of the Tamil Nadu Cinemas (Regulations)

Rules, 1957 is in issue in this appeal.

2. The appellant owns and operates a touring talkies by the name of Sri Karthikeya Touring Talkies. The State of Tamil Nadu has enacted the Tamil Nadu Cinemas (Regulation) Act, 1955 with the object of regulating exhibition by means of cinematographs in the State of Tamil Nadu. Section

10 of the Act empowers the Government to make rules to carry out the h purposes of the Act.

3. Section 11 of the Act reads as under."11. Power to exempt.-The Government may, by order in writing exempt, subject to such conditions and restrictions as they may impose any cinematograph exhibitions or class of cinematograph exhibitions or any place where a cinematograph exhibition is given from any of the provisions of this Act or of any rules made thereunder."

4. In exercise of the power conferred by the Act. the State of Tamil Nadu has framed the Tamil Nadu Cinemas (Regulation) Rules, 1957. Rule 14 thereof reads as under.

"14. (I) There shall be no restriction to the grant of licences to permanent and touring cinemas on

























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top