SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(SC) 1838

State Of Punjab – Appellant
Versus
BHAGWAN SINGH – Respondent


ORDER

1.Special leave granted.

2. This is an appeal by the State of Punjab against the judgment of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana dated 12-8-1999 passed in RSA No. 3454 of 1998 affirming the judgment of the District Judge dated 6-8-1998. The learned District Judge reversed the judgment of the trial court and decreed the suit filed by the respondent seeking to set aside the order of discharge dated 4-9-1992 passed by the competent authority and directed the reinstatement with all benefits. The question is whether the impugned order of discharge dated 4-9-1992 is bad in law.

3. The impugned order dated 4-9-1992 was passed by the competent authority. It reads as follows:

"It has been reported to me by In-charge of PTC, Ladha Kofthi, Sangrur, Inspector Joginder Singh, RI Police Lines, Faridkot and Inspector Sadhu Ram, PS City Kot Kapura that the act and conduct of Const. Bhagwan Singh, No. 18191Fdkt. on the whole is not satisfactory and he is unlikely to become a good police officer. I am also satisfied with their reports. I, Jasminder Singh, IPS, SSPI Faridkot being competent authority do hereby discharge Const. Bhagwan Singh, No. 18191Fdk. from service w.e.f. today i.e. 4-9-199







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top