SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1966 Supreme(SC) 327

C.A.VAIDIALINGAM, J.C.SHAH, K.SUBBA RAO, S.M.SIKRI, V.RAMASWAMI
A. G. BENJAMIN – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent


Judgment

RAMASWAMI, J.

( 1 ) THIS appeal is brought from the judgment of the Punjab High court, dated 3/11/1965 in Letters Patent Appeal No. 21-D of 1965

( 2 ) THE appellant-A. G. Benjamin-was temporarily employed as a Stores Officer in the central Tractor Organisation with effect from 14/09/1949. As he was not a confirmed government servant. his services could be terminated under Rule 5 of the central Civil service (Temporary Service) Rules 1949 with one months notice on either side. Under this rule the services of the appellant were terminated on 23/04/1954, the date on which the notice was served upon him. It appears that there were certain complaints made against the appellant while he was employed as Stores Officer in the central Tractor organisation. In respect of these complaints the Chairman of the central Tractor Organisation sent a notice to the appellant asking him to show cause why disciplinary action should not be taken against him. At first Sri Bhagwan Singh, Deputy Chairman of his Organisation was appointed as Enquiry Officer, but on his transfer Sri R. N. Mathur, was appointed on 13/08/1953 to conduct the enquiry. Before the enquiry could be completed, the Chairman rec






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top