G.P.MATHUR, G.S.SINGHVI
Sattatiya @ Satish Rajanna Kartalla – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent
judgment
Per G.S. Singhvi, J. —
1.This appeal by special leave is directed against the judgment of the Bombay High Court, which upheld the conviction of the appellant under Section 302 I.P.C. and sentence of life imprisonment awarded to him by Additional Sessions Judge, Greater Bombay in Sessions Case No.28/1995.
2.On 1.10.1994, PW1 Dr. Rasiklal Dwarkadas Dani, a resident of Pratap Building 173, Dadiseth Agyari Lane, Mumbai, telephonically informed Assistant Police Inspector (API), PW14 R.R. Gaekwad of Police Station Tilak Nagar that a man, who was later on, identified as Satish, was lying on the right side of the stairs of the building in a pool of blood. API Gaekwad reached the spot and removed that person to G.T. Hospital, where he was declared brought dead. PW14 recorded the information given by Dr. Dani as Ex.P6 and treated the same as FIR. He then handed over the investigation to PW13 Shamsherkhan Wazirkhan Pathan, who was acting as night Police Inspector at L.T. Marg Police Station. The latter prepared Panchnama of the dead body. From the papers found in the pocket of the clothes of the deceased, the police contacted his brother, PW3 Rajaiyya Pochyya Bandapalli on 1.10.1994 it
Bodhraj alias Bodha v. State of Jammu and Kashmir
Hanumant Govind Nargundkar v. State of M.P.
Sharad Birdhichand Sarda v. State of Maharashtra
State of U.P. v. Ashok Kumar Srivastava
Reddy Sampath Kumar v. State of A.P.
Padala Veera Reddy v. State of A.P.
Deepak Chandrakant Patil v. State of Maharashtra
Ramreddy Rajesh Khanna Reddy v. State of A.P.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.