SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(SC) 1029

R.V.RAVEENDRAN, LOKESHWAR SINGH PANTA
Faqir Chand Gulati – Appellant
Versus
Uppal Agencies Pvt. Ltd. – Respondent


Judgment

R.V. Raveendran, J. —

This appeal is against the Order dated 3.2.2004 passed by the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (‘Commission’ for short) in Revision Petition No. 1878 of 2000. It relates to the question whether a land owner, who enters into an agreement with a builder, for construction of an Apartment Building and for sharing of the constructed area, is a `consumer’ entitled to maintain a complaint against the builder as a service-provider under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986.

The agreement

2.The appellant is the owner of premises no. L-3, Kailash Colony, New Delhi. He entered into a ‘collaboration agreement’ dated 17.5.1991 with the first respondent, the terms of which are, in brief, as follows :

(i)The owner shall place at the disposal of the builder, vacant possession of the premises and authorize the builder to secure necessary sanctions, permissions and approvals for demolition of the existing building and construction and completion of a new building.

(iii)The builder shall demolish the existing structure and construct a residential building consisting of ground, first and second floors, at its cost and expense.

(iv)The builder will have the right to





















































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top