SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(SC) 1037

B.N.AGARWAL, TARUN CHATTERJEE, D.K.JAIN
BABBAN RAI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF BIHAR – Respondent


ORDER

1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. The two appellants, along with accused Vishwanath Rai, Dharmu Rai, Ram Dayal Rai and Baleshwar Rai, were convicted by the trial court under Sections 302 and 302/149 of the Penal Code, 1860 (hereinafter referred to as e "IPC") and sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life. Dharmu Rai was further convicted under Sections 324 and 148 IPC and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for one year on both counts. Ram Dayal Rai was further convicted under Sections 323 and 147 IPC and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of six months and one year respectively. Baleshwar Rai was further convicted under Sections 341 and 148 IPC and f sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of six months and one year respectively. Babban Rai was further convicted under Sections 341 and 147 IPC and was sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for six months and one year respectively. Accused Dharam Nath Rai was also convicted under Section 147 IPC and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for one year. All the sentences were ordered to run 9 concurrently. On appeal being preferred, the High Court confirmed the convic





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top