S.B.SINHA, MUKUNDAKAM SHARMA
Vishnu Dutt Sharma – Appellant
Versus
Daya Sapra – Respondent
JUDGMENT
S.B. Sinha, J.—
1. Leave granted.
2. The effect of a judgment passed in a criminal proceeding on a pending civil proceeding is the question involved herein. It arises in the following factual matrix.
Respondent borrowed a sum of Rs.1,50,000/- (Rupees One Lakh Fifty Thousand Only) from the appellant herein on or about 10th August, 1999. On a demand having been made in that regard by the appellant, the respondent issued a cheque for the aforementioned sum on or about 20th October, 1999. The said cheque was presented by the appellant to the Oriental Bank of Commerce, Shahdra, Delhi, but the cheque was received back by the appellant with remarks ‘insufficient funds’.
3. A complaint petition was filed by the appellant against the respondent for alleged commission of offences under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and Section 420 of the Indian Penal Code on 29-01-2000. He also filed a suit for recovery of a sum of Rs. 2,04,000/- on 19-10-2002 in the Court of Senior Civil Judge at Delhi which was marked as Suit No. 253 of 2003.
Both in the criminal as also in the civil proceedings the defence raised by the respondent was that she had not taken any loan from the appel
Krishna Janardhan Bhat v. Dattatraya G. Hegde
Bharat Barrel & Drum Manufacturing Company v. Amin Chand Payrelal
Seth Ramdayal Jat v. Laxmi Prasad
M.S. Sheriff v. State of Madras
K.G. Premshanker v. Inspector of Police
M/s Karam Chand Ganga Prasad v. Union of India
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.