DEEPAK VERMA, S.B.SINHA
Inderchand Jain (D) through – Appellant
Versus
Motilal (D) through – Respondent
JUDGMENT
S.B. SINHA, J.—
1. Leave granted.
2. The jurisdiction of a Court and/or the extent thereof to review its own decision is the question involved in this appeal. It arises out of a judgment and order dated 13.10.2006 passed by a learned Single Judge of the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan, Jaipur Bench, Jaipur in S.B. Civil Review Petition No.33/2006 in S.B. Civil First Appeal No.36 of 1976 and and S.B. Civil First Appeal No.36 of 1976.
3. Before adverting to the aforementioned question, we may notice the admitted facts. An agreement was entered into by and between the parties on or about 15.10.1972 whereby and whereunder Inder Chand Jain-appellant had agreed to sell a ‘haveli’ to Motilal - respondent for a consideration of Rs.1,15,000/-, out of which a sum of Rs.20,000/- was paid in advance. Respondent filed a suit for specific performance before the District Judge, Jaipur City, in which a decree was passed on 11.11.1975. Being dissatisfied, the appellant filed Civil First Appeal before the High Court which was allowed on 12.03.1987 whereby the judgment and order of the trial court was set aside. On an intra court appeal filed by the respondent, a Division Bench of the
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.