SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(SC) 469

S.B.SINHA, ASOK KUMAR GANGULY, R.M.LODHA
Abdul Rahim – Appellant
Versus
Sk. Abdul Zabar – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellants :RK. Dash, Sr. Advocate, Suchit Mohanty, Anupam Lal Das, Advocates. For the Respondents:Bharat Sangal, Prasenjit Das, Mrinalini Dinam, Vernika Tomar, Advocates

Judgement Key Points

The core subject of this judgment is the interpretation and application of Islamic law regarding the validity of a gift, specifically focusing on whether the transfer of possession, either actual or constructive, fulfills the legal requirements for a valid gift under Muslim law. The primary question addressed is whether the handing over of possession—whether actual, constructive, or deemed—subserves the legal necessity for establishing the validity of a gift, and whether the possession was effectively transferred in this case to render the gift valid.


Judgment :-

S.B. Sinha, J.

1. Leave granted

2. Interpretation and/or application of the Islamic Law on Gift vis-à-vis handing over of possession of the property gifted is the question involved in this appeal. It arises out of a judgment and order dated 30.6.2008 passed by the High Court of Orissa at Cuttack in First Appeal No. 197 of 1982 whereby and whereunder the First Appeal filed by the respondent No.1 - plaintiffs has been allowed decreeing the suit.

3. Indisputably, the properties in question belonged to one Haji Sk. Abdullah. He had two sons and four daughters. Respondent No.1 - plaintiff was his elder son; whereas Abdul Razak (‘Razak) (since deceased), father of appellants, was the younger son. His daughters were married. He gifted some lands in favour of his daughters in 1960. They in turn relinquished their rights in his properties. He executed a registered deed of gift in favour of Razak on or about 21.2.1973. The property gifted was a house. Adjoining thereby was a small patch of land which belonged to the State. The State had granted a temporary lease in favour of Haji Sk. Abdullah. It was being used for ingress to and egress from the said house. It is also not in dispu



































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top