TARUN CHATTERJEE, AFTAB ALAM
Mummidi Apparao (D) Tr. LRs. – Appellant
Versus
Nagarjuna Fertilisers & Chem. Ltd. – Respondent
Judgment :
Heard learned counsel for the parties.
The line in para 1 of the Judgment dated 21st of November, 2008, namely, In course of hearing, counsel appearing for the claimants/landholders stated that they accepted the compensation fixed by the High Court and did not wish to challenge the High Court Judgment any longer; hence, SLP (Civil) Nos. 3635 and 3711 of 2007 are dismissed as not pressed" be read as under :-
"In course of hearing, counsel appearing for the claimants/landholders stated that they accepted the compensation fixed by the High Court and did not wish to challenge the High Court Judgment any longer; hence, SLP (Civil) Nos. 3635 and 3711 of 2007 are dismissed."
IAs are disposed of accordingly.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.