SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH)
MR. JUSTICE MARKANDEY KATJU & MRS. JUSTICE GYAN SUDHA MISRA, JJ.
GIAN SINGH-Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
STATE OF PUNJAB & ANR-Respondent(s)
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl) No(s).8989/2010
(From the judgement and order dated 17/09/2010 in CRM No. 27367/2010 of
Decided on : 23/11/2010
Advocates Appeared :
For Petitioner(s) Mr. Rajiv Kataria, Adv.for
M/S. Delhi Law Chambers
(2003) 4 SCC 675; (2008) 9 SCC 677; (2008) 16 SCC 1-Not correctly decided.
ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner has relied on three decisions of this Court, all by two Judge Benches. They are B.S.Joshi vs. State of Haryana (2003) 4 SCC 675; Nikhil Merchant vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and Another (2008) 9 SCC 677; and Manoj Sharma vs. State and Others (2008) 16 SCC 1. It is true that in the last two decisions, one of us, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Markandey Katju, was a member but a Judge should always be open to correct his mistakes. We feel that these decisions require re-consideration and hence we direct that this matter be placed before a larger Bench to reconsider the correctness of the aforesaid three decisions. Let the papers of this case be placed before Hon'ble Chief Justice of India for constituting a larger Bench.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.