Based on the provided legal document, the key points are as follows:

1. Burden of Proof in Sale of Minor’s Property: When a person, after attaining majority, questions a sale of their property made by a guardian during their minority, the burden lies on the party asserting the purchase to prove that the guardian had the authority to sell and that the transaction was bona fide (!) .

2. Burden of Proof in Sale for Legal Necessity: The initial burden is on the party claiming that the sale was executed for legal necessity to establish this fact. If they fail to do so, the burden does not shift to the minor or their successor to disprove the sale (!) (!) .

3. Proper Trial Principles: A suit must be decided based on the pleadings filed by the parties, and decisions that ignore these pleadings are vitiated. The court must evaluate the case on the basis of the pleadings and evidence presented by the parties (!) (!) .

4. Limitation and Delay in Challenging Sale Deeds: A person who was a minor at the time of a sale and later questions its validity must do so within the prescribed limitation period after attaining majority. Delay beyond this period can bar the claim, especially if the person had the opportunity to challenge the sale earlier (!) (!) .

5. Misplaced Burden of Proof Affects Judgments: Erroneously shifting the burden of proof or misinterpreting which party bears the proof obligation can lead to a flawed judgment. Proper application of the law requires that the burden remains with the party making the assertion, and misplacing it can invalidate the decision (!) (!) .

6. Inclusion of Property in Partition Suit: In a partition suit, only properties with clear and lawful title should be included. If a third party’s property is included without proper proof of ownership or legal title, the court must exclude it from the partition (!) (!) .

7. Effect of Delay and Knowledge on Challenging Sale Deeds: If a party is in actual possession of their property and only becomes aware of a sale years later, they are not barred from challenging the sale, especially if the suit was filed within a reasonable time after gaining knowledge. Delay in challenging a sale deed executed during minority does not necessarily bar the claim if the party was unaware of the sale (!) (!) .

8. Court’s Role in Correcting Errors: The appellate and trial courts must adhere to principles of legal evidence and pleadings. Errors such as misplacing the burden of proof or including property without proper title can lead to the modification or setting aside of decisions, including partition decrees (!) (!) (!) .

9. Final Outcome: The appeal was partly allowed, and the property transferred through the sale deed was excluded from the partition. The court emphasized that the party asserting the sale’s validity must prove it, and failure to do so invalidates the transaction. The judgment underscores the importance of proper proof, timely challenge, and adherence to legal principles in property disputes involving minors and guardians (!) (!) .

10. Costs: The respondent who initiated the collusive or invalid proceedings was ordered to pay costs to the appellant for unnecessary litigation (!) .

These points collectively highlight the legal principles concerning the sale of property by guardians during minority, the burden of proof, limitation periods, proper trial procedures, and the importance of accurate pleadings and evidence in property and partition disputes.