SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(SC) 77

2011 (3) SCC 217
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
MARKANDEY KATJU AND R.M. LODHA, JJ.
SHREE SIDHBALI STEELS LIMITED AND OTHERS - Petitioners;
Versus
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND OTHERS - Respondents.
Writ Petition (C) No. 537 of 2000
Decided on : January 20, 2009

Advocates appeared:
Shanti Bhushan and M.L. Lahoty, Senior Advocates (Paban Kr. Sharma and Sudhir Kr. Gupta, Advocates) for the Petitioners;
Shail Kr. Dwivedi, Additional Advocate General (Pradeep Misra, Anuvrat Sharma, Ms Vibha Dwivedi and Ms Vandana Mishra, Advocates) for the Respondents.

IMPORTANT POINT
When decision of a coordinate Bench comes into question, the matter should be referred to larger Bench.

Headnote:Administration of Justice – Judicial Propriety – Important question of public interest – Court earlier holding that development rebate will not be available after coming into force of U.P. Electricity Reforms Act, 1999 – Petitioner contending that State is entitled to issue policy directions to Regulatory Commission even under Act, 1999 – Issue of whether the rebate concession granted to the writ petitioner from 1997 to 2002 should continue till 2002 or will cease to have effect after 14-1-2000 referred to larger Bench. (Para 6, 7)

       U.P. Power Corpn. Ltd. v. Sant Steels & Alloys (P) Ltd. – Referred [Para 4]

       Facts of the case:

       In this case the correctness of U.P. Power Corpn. Ltd. v. Sant Steels & Alloys (P) Ltd. ia called I question.

       Finding of the Court:

       The matter needs to be considered by a larger Bench.

       Result:

       Issue of whether the rebate concession granted to the writ petitioner from 1997 to 2002 should continue till 2002 or will cease to have effect after 14-1-2000 referred to larger Bench. (Para 6, 7)

ORDER

1. This writ petition has been filed under Article 32 of the Constitution of India.

2. Heard Shri Shanti Bhushan, learned Senior Counsel for the writ petitioner, Shri Pradeep Mishra, learned counsel for U.P. Power Corpn. Ltd. and Shri Shail Kumar Dwivedi for the State of Uttar Pradesh.

3. It appears that the petitioner had been granted the development rebate of 33.33% by the U.P. State Electricity Board and it is alleged that this was in view of the policy of the State Government to encourage industrialisation of the hill areas.

4. Subsequently, the U.P. Electricity Reforms Act, 1999 came into force with effect from 14-1-2000. This Court by its judgment in U.P. Power Corpn. Ltd. v. Sant Steels & Alloys (P) Ltd. held that the rebate concession would be valid till the Act of 1999 came into force (vide SCC para 34).

5. Shri Shanti Bhushan, learned Senior Counsel submits that the observation in the aforesaid para 34 that the writ petitioner is not entitled to the rebate concession after 14-1-2000 is legally not correct because under Section 12 of the U.P. Electricity Reforms Act, 1999, the State Government is entitled to issue policy directions to the Regulatory Commission, just as it earlier had power to issue policy directions to the U.P. State Electricity Board under Section 78-A of the Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948.

6. We are of the opinion that this argument of Shri Shanti Bhushan, requires consideration by a larger Bench since it is an important question as there can be no doubt that industrialisation of hill areas in the State of Uttaranchal is in the public interest.

7. In view of this we are of the opinion that this question, as to whether the rebate concession granted to the writ petitioner from 1997 to 2002 should continue till 2002 or will cease to have effect after 14-1-2000 and. thereafter, deserves consideration by a larger Bench being an important question of law. Let the papers of this case be put before the Hon’ble the Chief Justice of India for deciding the aforesaid question.

Court Masters

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top