2011 (4) SCC 374
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
R. V. Raveendran, P. Sathasivam,A. K. Patnaik JJ.
Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited ... Appellant
Versus
Ghanshyam Dass & Ors. ... Respondents
WITH
CIVIL APPEAL NO.4370 of 2006
Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited - Appellant
Versus
Chhidu Singh & Ors. - Respondents
CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4369 OF 2006
Decided On: February 17, 2011.
On the petition of some employee CAT has directed that such of the employees who are seniors o those who are in Grade III, otherwise than to those who were earlier promoted by virtue of the service in basic cadre. High court dismissed the writ petition filed by he present appellant against this decision.
The present appeal was allowed quashing the decision of the CAT holding that the decision of the Government to make promotions to Grade-IV on the basis of their seniority in the basic grade could take effect only from 13.12.1995 and not from a prior date and the respondents, who had filed O.A. No.2484 of 1997 and O.A. No.2099 of 1997 in the Central Administrative Tribunal could not claim any promotion to Grade-IV on the basis of their seniority in the basic cadre with effect from any date prior to 13.12.1995
JUDGMENT
A. K. PATNAIK, J.
These two appeals are against two separate but identical orders passed by Division Bench of the High Court of Delhi on 22.05.2003 in C.W. No.4555 of 2002 and C.W. No.4556 of 2002.
2. The facts very briefly are that in the Department of Telecommunications of the Government of India there are four Grades of employees and these are:
Basic Grade [Telegraph Assistant / Telegraphist] = Pay
Scale Rs.975-1660.
Grade II [Section Supervisor / Telegraph Master] = Pay Scale Rs.1400-2300.
Grade III [Senior Section Supervisor] = Pay Scale Rs.1600-2660.
Grade IV [Chief Section Supervisor] = Pay Scale Rs.2000-3200.
3. Initially, promotions from one Grade to the higher grade were made on the basis of seniority to the 2/3rd of the posts and on the basis of departmental examination to the 1/3rd of the posts. With effect from 30.11.1983, the Government of India, Ministry of Communications, Department of Telecommunications (for short `the Government') introduced One Time Bound Promotion Scheme under which regular employees, who had completed sixteen years of service in a grade, were placed in the next higher grade.
4. Thereafter, by a circular dated 16.10.1990 the Government introduced a new Scheme known as Biennial Cadre Review' (for short `the BCR Scheme'). Under the BCR Scheme, those employees, who were on regular service as on 01.01.1990 and had completed 26 years of satisfactory service in the basic grades, were to be screened by a duly constituted Committee to assess their performance and determine their suitability for advancement and if they were found suitable they were to be upgraded in the higher scale. The circular dated 16.10.1990, however, limited such upgradation to 10% of the posts in the lower pay-scale and the review of the cadres for the purpose of such upgradation was to take place once in two years.
5. The Government then issued clarifications on some points in its letter dated 11.03.1991 on the BCR Scheme. Point No.10 and the clarification thereon in the letter dated 11.03.1991 are quoted hereunder:-
"Point raised by the field unit Clarification
"10. Whether Officers already The seniority of officials is to be
having pay scale of Rs. maintained with reference to the basic
1600-2600 will rank senior cadres and functional
to Officials in the promotional posts they hold and
scale of Rs.1400-2300 for not merely with
the 10% quota (Rs.2000- reference to the pay scales."
3200)
4. Some officers of Grade III who were senior in the basic grade but had lost their seniority in Grade III because of their later promotions and who were not considered for upgradation to Grade IV under the BCR Scheme, namely, Smt. Santosh Kapoor and others, filed O.A. No.1455 of 1991 before the Central Administrative Tribunal, New Delhi, contending on the basis of clarification on Point No.10 made in the letter dated 11.0.3.1991 that under the BCR Scheme, seniority in the basic grade was to be counted for the purpose of upgradation on completion of 26 years of service and this contention was resisted by the Government and other respondents in the O.A. and the Tribunal in its order dated 07.07.1992 directed that promotions of 10% posts in the s
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.