SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(SC) 1539

B.N.AGARWAL, A.K.MATHUR
CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION – Appellant
Versus
MUKESH PRAVINCHANDRA SHROFF – Respondent


ORDER

1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. By the impugned order, the Special Court has discharged the accused Raghunath Lekhraj Wadhwa, Jitendra Ratilal Shroff and Mukesh Pravinchandra Shroff from Special Case No.4 of 1997. From a bare perusal of the impugned order, it would appear that the Special Court has virtually passed an order of acquittal in the garb of an order of discharge. It is well settled that at the stage of framing of the charge, what is required to be seen is as to whether there are sufficient grounds to proceed against the accused.

In our view, the Special Court was not justified in discharging the aforesaid accused persons.

3. Accordingly, the appeals are allowed and the impugned order of discharge is set aside. Now the Special Court shall proceed further with the case. It is needless to say that this order shall not in any manner prejudice the h case of the respondents during the trial.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top