SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(SC) 756

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
J.M. Panchal, Deepak Verma and B.S. Chauhan, JJ.
Appellants: Siddhu Matriculation Hr. Secondary School
Vs.
Respondent: K. Shyam Sunder and Ors.
Civil Appeal Nos. 6028, 6029, 6031 and 6032 of 2011 and Contempt Petition Nos. 268-281 of 2011 in Civil Appeal Nos. 4879-4892 of 2011
Decided On: 09.08.2011

Advocates Appeared:
For Appellant/Petitioner/Plaintiff: A. Navaneetha Krishna, AG, TN, Guru Krishna Kumar, A. Sethuraman, AAG, TN, P.P. Rao, C.A. Sundaram, Rajeev Dhavan, Sr. Advs., Subramonium Prasad, Anesh Paul, Apeksha Saran, Sweta Mohta, Akshat Hansaria, Utsav Sidhu, V.P. Sengottuvel, S. Ravi Shankar, Rohini Musa, Yogesh Kotemmath, Zafar Inayat, G. Umapathy, Sudha Umapathy, P.V. Yogeswaran, Debmalya banerjee and Manik Karanjawala, Advs. For karanjawala and Co.
For Respondents/Defendant: T.R. Andhyarujina, M.N, Krishnamani, R. Viduthalai, Dhruv Mehta, Basava Prabhu S. Patil, A.T.M. Ranga Ramanujam, Sr. Advs., T. Harish Kumar, S. Beno Benciger, Sameer, Sri Ram Krishna, B. Vinod Khanna, S. Prabhu Rama Subramanian, Sabarish Subramanian, Suresh Sakthi Murugan, S.J. Aristole, Ankolekar Gurudatta, S. Ashok Kumar, Gouri Karuna Das Mohanti, Anu Gupta, Sanjeev Kumar Sharma, G. Sivabalamurugan, Anis Mohd., L.K. Pandey, Prakhar Sharma, S. Nanda Kumar, Satish Kumar, Anjali Chauhan, Parivesh Kumar Singh, R. Satish Kumar, V.N. Raghupathy, Prashant Bhushan, P.B. Suresh Babu, S. Gowthaman, S.R. Setia, M. Yogesh Kanna and Himmat Singh Shergill, Advs.

Headnote:A) Contempt of Courts Act, Section 12:- The contempt petitions had been dropped in view of the closure of the civil appeals.

ORDER

1. All the Civil appeals are disposed of in terms of our judgment delivered today in Civil Appeal Nos. 6015-6027 of 2011 (State of Tamil Nadu and Ors. v. K. Shyam Sunder and Ors.). All other applications, if any, filed in these appeals/connected matters also stand disposed of.

2. We do not think it appropriate to entertain the contempt petitions. Thus, the same stand dismissed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top