SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(SC) 173

P.SATHASIVAM, J.CHELAMESWAR
Margret Almeida & Ors. , Etc. Etc. – Appellant
Versus
Bombay Catholic Coop. Housing Society Limited – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Chelameswar, J.

This is an Application filed with the prayer as follows:

‘In the above facts and circumstances, the Applicants / Appellants most respectfully pray that the Hon’ble Court may be pleased to:

a) Clarify the order dated 30.01.2012 passed by this Hon’ble Court in Civil appeal No.1175-1177 of 2012 titled as “Margret Almeida & Ors. Etc. Etc Versus The Bombay Catholic Co-operative Housing Society Ltd. & Ors. Etc. etc.” as sought in Para 6; and / or

b) Pass such other further or other reliefs as the Applicants / Appellants may be found to be entitled under the facts and circumstances stated hereinabove.”

2. By the Judgment dated 30-01-2012 C.A.Nos.1175 - 1177 of 2012 were disposed of setting aside the Judgment dated 29-08-2011 of a Division Bench of the Bombay High Court. The said Judgment was rendered in a batch of connected matters, arising out of two suits No.144 & 145 of 2010, on the original side of the Bombay High Court. The question before the Division Bench was whether the two suits were maintainable in view of Section 91 of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960. It appears from the Division Bench Judgment of the High Court that the learned Trial Judg












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top