SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(SC) 453

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
D.K. JAIN & ANIL R. DAVE, JJ.
DELHI RACE CLUB LTD. - Appellants
VERSUS
UNION OF INDIA & ORS. - Respondents
Civil Appeal No. 6461 of 2003
Decided on 13-07-2012.

IMPORTANT POINTS
1. The true test to determine the character of a levy, delineating tax from fee is the primary object of the levy and the essential purpose intended to be achieved.
2. A licence fee imposed for regulatory purposes is not conditioned by the fact that there must be a quid pro quo for the services rendered, but that, such licence fee must be reasonable and not excessive. If there is a broad correlation between the expenditure which the State incurs and the fees charged, the fees could be sustained as reasonable.

Headnote:Mysore Race Courses Licensing Act, 1952 - Section 11(2)-Delhi Race Course Licensing (Amendment) Rules, 2001- Commissioner of Excise, Entertainment & Luxury Tax ,Respondent no.3 issued a demand letter to Delhi Race Club, a body corporate, the appellant informing them that the licence fee deposited by them was short by Rs.17,80,000/- for the year 2001-02 and by Rs.18 Lacs for the year 2002- 03- Writ petition-Dismissed by High Court-Appeal- The object of the Act, is to regulate, monitor, control and encourage the sport of horse-racing- For this purpose, licences are issued subject to certain conditions- The compliance with the licence conditions is inevitable for renewal of the licences as well as significant to avoid any penalty under the Act- To ensure such compliance, district officers/ entertainment tax officers are entrusted with the duty of inspection.- The nature of inspection enjoined by the Act is not of a general nature but requires expertise and training and also constant vigil on the activities of the race course- The expenses incurred in carrying out such regular inspections have to be considerable-Hence, in the licence fee imposed in the instant case was a regulatory fee and need not necessarily entail rendition of specific services in return - Licence fee charged had a broad co-relation with the object and purpose for which the Act and the 2001 Rules had been enacted-Since scheme of the Act clearly spelled out the object, policy and the intention with which it had been enacted, no interference warranted with Act as being an instance of excessive delegation- High Court held justified in holding that Section 11(2) of the Act as well as 2001 Rules did not suffer from any legal infirmity-Appeal dismissed (Paras 25 to 30)

        Delegation of Legislative Functions-Scope and ambit of-Ddelegation of non essential legislative function of fixation of rate of imposts is a necessity to meet the multifarious demands of a welfare state- But while delegating such a function laying down of a clear legislative policy is pre-requisite - While delegating the power of fixation of rate of tax, there must be in existence, inter-alia, some guidance, control, safeguards and checks in the concerned Act-As long as the legislative policy is defined in clear terms, which provides guidance to the delegate, such delegation of a non essential legislative function is permissible (Para 16)

       Facts of the Case :

        Present appeal has been filed against judgment, rendered by High Court wherein High Court had upheld the validity of the Delhi Race Course Licensing (Amendment) Rules, 2001.

       Findings of the Court :

        Section 11(2) of the Act as well as 2001 Rules do not suffer from any legal infirmity. Appeal, being bereft of any merit, wass dismissed

       Result : Appeal dismissed

       

JUDGMENT

D.K. Jain, J.-This is an appeal from a judgment, dated 5th February, 2003, rendered by the High Court of Delhi at New Delhi in CWP No.2278/2002. By the impugned judgment, the High Court has upheld the validity of the Delhi Race Course Licensing (Amendment) Rules, 2001.

2. On 19th October, 1984, the Central Government in exercise of its powers under Section 2 of the Union Territories (Laws) Act, 1950, extended the Mysore Race Courses Licensing Act, 1952 (for short “the Act”) to the Union Territory of Delhi, as it existed then, with certain amendments. The Preamble to the said Act reads thus:

“Whereas it is expedient to make provision for the licensing regulation, control and management of horse-racing on race-course and all matters connected therewith in the Union Territory of Delhi”

Further, Section 3 of the Act reads as follows:

“3. Prohibition of horse-racing on unlicensed race-courses- No horse- race shall be held save on a race course for which a licence for horse racing granted in accordance with the provisions of this Act, is in force.”

Section 4 which lays down the procedure for issuing the licences for horse racing reads as follows:

“4. Licences for horse-racing-

(1) The owner, lessee or occupier of any race course may apply to the Government for horse-racing on such race-course or for arranging for wagering or betting in such race- course on a horse, race run or some other race-course either within the Union territory of Delhi or Outside the Union territory of Delhi.

(2) The Government may (if in its opinion public interest so requires) withhold such licence or grant it subject to such conditions and for such period as they may think fit.

(3) In particular and without prejudice to the generality of the foregoing power, such conditions may provide for-

(a) the payment of a licence fee;

(b) the maintenance of such accounts and furnishing of such returns as are required by the United Provinces Entertainment and Betting Tax Act, 1937 as extended to the Union territory of Delhi;

(c) the amount of stakes which may be allotted for different kinds of horses;

(d) the measures to be taken for the training of persons to become Jockeys;

(e) the measures to be taken to encourage Indian bred horses and Indian Jockeys;

(f) the inclusion or association of such persons as the Government may nominate as Stewards or members in the conduct and management of horse- racing;

(g) the utilisation of the amount collected by the licensee in the conduct and management of horse-racing;

(h) such other matters connected with horse-racing and the maintenance of the race-course for which in the opinion of Government it is necessary or expedient to make provision in the licence. …..”

Sections 5, 6 and 7 respectively enumerate penalties for taking part in horse races on unlicensed race-course and for contravention of conditions of licence. Section 9 envisages that cognizance of the offences under the Act can be taken by a court not inferior to that of a Metropolitan Magistrate. Section 11, the pivotal provision, which empowers the Government to make rules, reads as follows:

“11. Power to make rules-

(1) The Government may, by notification in the Delhi Gazette, make rules for the purpose of carrying into effect the provisions of this Act.

(2) In particular and without prejudice to the generality of the foregoing powers; such rules may provide for all or any of the following matters, namely:-

(i) the form and manner in which applications for licences are to be made;

(ii) the fees payable for such licences;

(iii) the period for which licences are to be granted;

(iv) the renewal, modification and cancellation of licences.”

3. In furtherance of the power conferred under Section 11 of the Act, by a notification dated 1st March 1985, the Administration of the Union Territory of Delhi, notified the Delhi Race Course Licensing Rules, 1985 [for short “1985 Rules”]. Rules 4 and 5 of the 1985 Rules lay down the procedure for submission of


























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top