SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
D.K. JAIN & ANIL R. DAVE, JJ.
DELHI RACE CLUB LTD. - Appellants
VERSUS
UNION OF INDIA & ORS. - Respondents
Civil Appeal No. 6461 of 2003
Decided on 13-07-2012.
Delegation of Legislative Functions-Scope and ambit of-Ddelegation of non essential legislative function of fixation of rate of imposts is a necessity to meet the multifarious demands of a welfare state- But while delegating such a function laying down of a clear legislative policy is pre-requisite - While delegating the power of fixation of rate of tax, there must be in existence, inter-alia, some guidance, control, safeguards and checks in the concerned Act-As long as the legislative policy is defined in clear terms, which provides guidance to the delegate, such delegation of a non essential legislative function is permissible (Para 16)
Facts of the Case :
Present appeal has been filed against judgment, rendered by High Court wherein High Court had upheld the validity of the Delhi Race Course Licensing (Amendment) Rules, 2001.
Findings of the Court :
Section 11(2) of the Act as well as 2001 Rules do not suffer from any legal infirmity. Appeal, being bereft of any merit, wass dismissed
Result : Appeal dismissed
JUDGMENT
D.K. Jain, J.-This is an appeal from a judgment, dated 5th February, 2003, rendered by the High Court of Delhi at New Delhi in CWP No.2278/2002. By the impugned judgment, the High Court has upheld the validity of the Delhi Race Course Licensing (Amendment) Rules, 2001.
2. On 19th October, 1984, the Central Government in exercise of its powers under Section 2 of the Union Territories (Laws) Act, 1950, extended the Mysore Race Courses Licensing Act, 1952 (for short “the Act”) to the Union Territory of Delhi, as it existed then, with certain amendments. The Preamble to the said Act reads thus:
“Whereas it is expedient to make provision for the licensing regulation, control and management of horse-racing on race-course and all matters connected therewith in the Union Territory of Delhi”
Further, Section 3 of the Act reads as follows:
“3. Prohibition of horse-racing on unlicensed race-courses- No horse- race shall be held save on a race course for which a licence for horse racing granted in accordance with the provisions of this Act, is in force.”
Section 4 which lays down the procedure for issuing the licences for horse racing reads as follows:
“4. Licences for horse-racing-
(1) The owner, lessee or occupier of any race course may apply to the Government for horse-racing on such race-course or for arranging for wagering or betting in such race- course on a horse, race run or some other race-course either within the Union territory of Delhi or Outside the Union territory of Delhi.
(2) The Government may (if in its opinion public interest so requires) withhold such licence or grant it subject to such conditions and for such period as they may think fit.
(3) In particular and without prejudice to the generality of the foregoing power, such conditions may provide for-
(a) the payment of a licence fee;
(b) the maintenance of such accounts and furnishing of such returns as are required by the United Provinces Entertainment and Betting Tax Act, 1937 as extended to the Union territory of Delhi;
(c) the amount of stakes which may be allotted for different kinds of horses;
(d) the measures to be taken for the training of persons to become Jockeys;
(e) the measures to be taken to encourage Indian bred horses and Indian Jockeys;
(f) the inclusion or association of such persons as the Government may nominate as Stewards or members in the conduct and management of horse- racing;
(g) the utilisation of the amount collected by the licensee in the conduct and management of horse-racing;
(h) such other matters connected with horse-racing and the maintenance of the race-course for which in the opinion of Government it is necessary or expedient to make provision in the licence. …..”
Sections 5, 6 and 7 respectively enumerate penalties for taking part in horse races on unlicensed race-course and for contravention of conditions of licence. Section 9 envisages that cognizance of the offences under the Act can be taken by a court not inferior to that of a Metropolitan Magistrate. Section 11, the pivotal provision, which empowers the Government to make rules, reads as follows:
“11. Power to make rules-
(1) The Government may, by notification in the Delhi Gazette, make rules for the purpose of carrying into effect the provisions of this Act.
(2) In particular and without prejudice to the generality of the foregoing powers; such rules may provide for all or any of the following matters, namely:-
(i) the form and manner in which applications for licences are to be made;
(ii) the fees payable for such licences;
(iii) the period for which licences are to be granted;
(iv) the renewal, modification and cancellation of licences.”
3. In furtherance of the power conferred under Section 11 of the Act, by a notification dated 1st March 1985, the Administration of the Union Territory of Delhi, notified the Delhi Race Course Licensing Rules, 1985 [for short “1985 Rules”]. Rules 4 and 5 of the 1985 Rules lay down the procedure for submission of
Corporation of Calcutta & Anr. Vs. Liberty Cinema [AIR (1965) SC 1107]
The Delhi Cloth & General Mills Co. Ltd. Vs. The Chief Commissioner
Kewal Krishan Puri Vs. State of Punjab [(1980) 1 SCC 416]; Referred (Para 9)
Secunderabad Hyderabad Hotel Owners Association & Ors. Vs. Hyderabad Municipal Corporation
A.P. Paper Mills Limited Vs. Government of A.P. & Anr [(2000) 8 SCC 167]; referred (Para 9)
re. Delhi Laws Act, 1912 [AIR 1951 SC 332]
Hingir Rampur Coal Co. Ltd. Vs. State of Orissa [1961 (2) SCR 537]
State of W.B. Vs. Kesoram Industries Ltd. & Ors. [(2004) 10 SCC 201]
Sreenivasa General Traders and Ors. Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh and Ors. [(1983) 4 SCC 353]
Shannon Vs. Lower Mainland Dairy Products Board [AIR 1939 PC 36]
Vam Organic Chemicals Ltd. & Anr. Vs. State of U.P. & Ors. [(1997) 2 SCC 715]
Kannadasan Vs. State of T.N. [(1996) 5 SCC 670
State of Tripura Vs. Sudhir Ranjan Nath [(1997) 3 SCC 665
Delhi Cloth & General Mills Co. Ltd. Vs. The Chief Commissioner, Delhi [(1969) 3 SCC 925
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.