P.SATHASIVAM, RANJAN GOGOI
MICHIGAN RUBBER – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
Please provide the content of the legal document (inside
JUDGMENT
P. Sathasivam, J.-Leave granted.
2. This appeal is directed against the final judgment and order dated 02.07.2008 passed by the High Court of Karnataka at Bangalore in Writ Appeal No. 1928 of 2007 whereby the High Court dismissed the appeal filed by the appellant-Company herein.
3. Brief facts:
(a) On 04.08.2005, the Karnataka State Road Transport Corporation (KSRTC) - Respondent No.2 herein floated a Tender being No. G30-05 for supply of Tyres, Tubes and Flaps specifying certain pre-qualification criteria.
(b) Challenging the said pre-qualification criteria, the appellant- Company, which is engaged in the manufacture and supply of tyres, tubes and flaps filed a Writ Petition being No. 20543 of 2005 before the High Court. After filing of the writ petition, the said criterion was withdrawn by the KSRTC. Thereafter, the KSRTC modified the pre-qualification criteria and issued a Tender being No. G-23-07 dated 05.07.2007 wherein, a new pre- qualification criterion was specified.
(c) Being aggrieved by the said pre-qualification criteria, the appellant- Company preferred a Writ Petition being No. 11951 of 2007 before the High Court. By judgment dated 13.09.2007, the learned Si
Tata Cellular v. Union of India
Raunaq International Ltd. v. I.V.R. Construction Ltd.
Union of India v. International Trading Co.
Jespar I. Slong v. State of Meghalaya
Association of Registration Plates v. Union of India
Reliance Airport Developers (P) Ltd. v. Airports Authority of India
Jagdish Mandal v. State of Orissa
Tejas Constructions & Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. v. Municipal Council, Sendhwa
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.