SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(SC) 1704

CYRIAC JOSEPH, J.M.PANCHAL
K. Subramanian – Appellant
Versus
R. Rajathi Rep. by P. O. A. P. Kaliappan – Respondent


Judgment

1. By filing this petition, the petitioner has prayed to review and recall order dated September 11, 2008 passed by this Court dismissing SLP (Crl.) No.6974 of 2008 @ Crl.M.P.No.14586 of 2008, on the ground that the amount of Rs.4,52,289/- payable by the petitioner to the original complainant, i.e. the respondent herein, is already paid pursuant to the compromise between the parties and the petitioner be permitted to compound the offence. The petitioner has filed Crl. M.P. No.12801 of 2009, to condone delay of 39 days, caused in filing review application and Crl.M.P. No.12803 of 2009 to permit him to compound the offence and acquit him by setting aside the conviction recorded in Criminal Case No.726 of 2003 by the learned Judicial Magistrate Karur. The petitioner has filed another Crl.M.P.No.12804 of 2009 with a prayer to permit him to produce affidavit sworn by him stating that pursuant to compromise between him and the respondent, he has paid Rs.4,52,289/-to the respondent as well as affidavit sworn by P.Kaliappan, power of attorney holder of R.Rajathi stating that pursuant to the compromise, he has received a sum of Rs.4,52,289/- as additional documents.

2. This Court ha







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top