SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(SC) 87

GYAN SUDHA MISRA, PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE
JAL MAHAL RESORTS PRIVATE LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
K. P. SHARMA – Respondent


Order

1. Hearing concluded. Judgment reserved. Written submissions may be filed by the parties within two weeks.

2. The learned Senior Counsel, Mr. Jaydeep Gupta, appearing for the State of Rajasthan, which was earlier represented by the learned Attorney General, had already advanced and concluded his arguments. However, the petitioner State has now filed an application for withdrawal of the special leave petitions filed by the State of Rajasthan and in view of the averments made therein, has sought permission to withdraw these petitions.

3. We see no reason to decline this request, as it is essentially the prerogative of the party to press or withdraw his petition(s) and, therefore, this Court would not come in the way of permitting the State of Rajasthan to withdraw these petitions. The special leave petitions, therefore, are dismissed as withdrawn in view of the request made.

4. However, in spite of withdrawal of the special leave petitions, if the petitioner State is taking a diametrically opposite stand which it had taken before the High Court as also before this Court when the arguments were concluded, we surely have reservations in permitting the learned Senior Counsel to take a



Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top