SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(SC) 113

DIPAK MISRA, ADARSH KUMAR GOEL
TEESTA ATUL SETALVAD – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent


ORDER

Heard Mr. Kapil Sibal, learned senior counsel, assisted by Ms. Aparna Bhat, learned counsel for the appellants and Mr. Mahesh Jethmalani, learned senior counsel, along with Mr. Prakash Jani, learned senior counsel for the respondent-State.

Dr. Rajeev Dhawan, Mr. Dushayant Dave, Mr. Huzefa Ahmadi, learned senior counsel and Mr. Bharat Sangal, learned counsel, appearing for the intervenors, thought it appropriate to withdraw the intervention applications with liberty to agitate their grievance when the occasion arises.

The intervention applications are permitted to be withdrawn.

Leave granted.

Hearing concluded.

As an interim measure, it is directed that the appellants shall not be arrested in connection with F.I.R. being C.R. No.1 of 2014, registered with D.C.P., Crime Branch, Ahmedabad, Gujarat.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top