SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA, N.V.RAMANA
KALYANI MATHIVANAN – Appellant
Versus
K. V. JEYARAJ – Respondent
Question 1?
JUDGMENT
SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA,J
These appeals have been preferred by the appellants against a common judgment and order dated 26th June, 2014 passed by the Division Bench of the Madras High Court, Madurai Bench in Writ Petition (MD) No.11350 of 2012 and Writ Petition (MD) No.3318 of 2013.
The aforesaid writ petitions were preferred by K.V. Jeyaraj and I. Ismail respondents/writ petitioners praying for issuance of a writ of quo warranto directing the appellant – Dr. Kalyani Mathivanan to show cause under what authority she continues to hold the office of the Vice-Chancellor, Madurai Kamaraj University.
2. By the impugned judgment the High Court held that the appellant-Dr. Kalyani Mathivanan did not satisfy the eligibility criteria stipulated by the UGC Regulations of Minimum Qualifications for Appointment of Teachers and other Academic Staff in Universities and Colleges and Measures for the Maintenance of Standards in Higher Education 2010 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘UGC Regulations, 2010’) for appointment as Vice-Chancellor and non-fulfilment of such eligibility criteria cannot be completely white washed on the specious plea that the University Grants Commission Regulations
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.