SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(SC) 1144

V.GOPALA GOWDA, S.A.BOBDE
Rajan – Appellant
Versus
Soly Sebastian – Respondent


Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Jayant Muthuraj and Sajith P., Advocates.
For the Respondents:Harsh Kumar and Arun Maji, Advocates for Binay Kumar Das, Advocate.

JUDGMENT :

V. Gopala Gowda, J.

Delay condoned. Leave granted.

2. This appeal is filed by the Appellant being aggrieved by the impugned judgment and award dated 4.3.2013 passed by the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam in Motor Accident Claims Appeal No. 1716 of 2008, whereby the High Court, while disposing of the appeal of the Appellant, declined to increase the compensation under any other heads, holding that the Appellant is entitled to an additional compensation of Rs. 2,03,200/- over and above the compensation awarded by the Motor Accident Claim Tribunal (for short "the Tribunal") with 9% interest per annum from the date of the claim petition till date of payment with direction to Insurance Company to deposit the amount within two months.

3. Originally, there were three Respondents, Respondent No. 1 is the owner of the offending vehicle, Respondent No. 2 is the driver and Respondent No. 3 is the Insurance Company, the insurer of the vehicle. Though, the name of Respondent No. 2 the driver has been deleted from the array of the parties vide Court's order dated 29.4.2015, for the sake of

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top