SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(SC) 951

G.S.SINGHVI, SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA
Mangalsen – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


JUDGMENT :

1. Leave granted.

2. Whether the proceedings initiated by the Competent Authority under the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 (for short, 'the 1976 Act') determination of the surplus land of the Appellant abated with the coming into force of the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Repeal Act, 1999 (for short, 'the 1999 Act') because possession of the surplus land had not been taken is the question which arises for consideration in this appeal filed against order dated 15.2.2011 passed by the Division Bench of the Allahabad High Court in Writ Petition No. 23229/2008.

3. The Appellant is the owner of land comprised in Khasra Nos. 296, 534, 535 and 559, Village Haru Nagla, Pargana and Tehsil Bareilly. After enforcement of the 1976 Act in the State of Uttar Pradesh, he filed a declaration Under Section 6(1) of that Act. The Competent Authority prepared draft statement and issued notice Under Section 8(3) proposing to declare 7337.39 square meters as surplus land. The Appellant filed objections dated 16.12.1981 in the form of an affidavit along with copy of an application made by him Under Section 20 for grant of exemption on the ground that he and his family is sole














Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top