SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(SC) 222

DIPAK MISRA, R.BANUMATHI, ASHOK BHUSHAN
Mukesh – Appellant
Versus
State For NCT of Delhi – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioners: Sanjay R. Hegde, Sr. Adv. (AC), Anil Kumar Mishra-I, S. Nithin, Atul Shankar Vinod, Pranjal Kishore, A. Tanvir, Raju Ramachandran, Sr. Adv., K. Parameshwar, Ms. Mythili Vijay Kumar Thallam, Vikram Aditya Narayan, Manohar Lal Sharma, Ms. Suman, Nitin Kumar Thakur, A.P. Singh, Ms. Geeta Chauhan, V.P. Singh, P.K. Tripathi, Pratima Rani, Ms. Richa Singh, S.P. Singh, C.K. Kesharwani, Pawan Trivedi, C.M. Sharma, Hemant Kumar, M. M. Kashyap, Advs.
For the Respondent: Siddharth Luthra, Sr. Adv., Ms. Supriya Juneja, Sameer Chaudhary, Viraj Gandhi, Ms. Shradha Karol, Ajay Sharma, Ms. Mehaad Jaggi, K.L. Janjani, B.K. Prasad, D.S. Mahra, Jaspreet Singh Rai, Rohit Nagpal, Siddhant Sharma, Shyamal Kumar, Arjun Vinod Bobde, Ms. Richa Relhan, Ms. Praneeta Sharma, Ms. Sanya Pawar, Rajat Joseph, Advs.

ORDER

In pursuance of our order dated 3.2.2017, affidavits on behalf of the petitioners have been filed. Mr. A.P. Singh, learned counsel has filed affidavits on behalf of the three accused persons, namely, Pawan Kumar Gupta, Vinay Sharma and Akshay Kumar Singh and Mr. M.L. Sharma, learned counsel has filed the affidavit on behalf of Mukesh. Be it noted, Mr. A.P. Singh, learned counsel has filed the translated version of the affidavits and Mr. Manohar Lal Sharma, learned counsel has filed the original version in Hindi as well as the translated one.

2. At this juncture, Mr. Raju Ramachandran, learned senior counsel who has been appointed as Amicus Curiae to assist the Court, submitted that two aspects are required to be further probed to comply with the order dated 3.2.2017 inasmuch as this Court has taken the burden on itself for compliance of Section 235(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Learned senior counsel would point out that the affidavit filed by Mukesh does not cover many aspects, namely, socio-economic background, criminal antecedents, family particulars, personal habits, education, vocational skills, physical health and his conduct in the prison.

3. Mr. Manohar Lal Sharm





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top