SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(SC) 773

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
A.K. Sikri, Ashok Bhushan, JJ.
Amina Marwa Sabreen A (Minor) and Others – Petitioners
Versus
State of Kerala and Others – Respondents
Writ Petition (Civil) No. 541 of 2017
Decided On : 24-08-2017

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioners: Radha Shyam Jena, Adv.
For the Respondents: Ms. Pallavi Pratap, Sayid Marzook Bafaki, Zulfiker Ali P. S, G. Prakash, Jishnu M. L., Ms. Priyanka Prakash, Ms. Beena Prakash, Advs.

IMPORTANT POINT
No document can be held unconstitutional and quashed merely on argument in absence of any prayer, pleadings and factual and documentary foundation. Such a writ petition would not be maintainable.

Headnote:Constitution of India – Article 32 – Petitioners, by argument, challenging vires of a GO – No reference to the G.O. in entire writ petition – GO not even part of the writ petition – No foundational facts and/or pleadings challenging the G.O. as unconstitutional – More importantly, no prayer seeking quashing of the G.O. – Writ petition held not maintainable. (Para 13)

       Facts of the case:

       The petitioners herein belong to Muslim minority community and are not residents of Kerala but Tamil Nadu. They have appeared in the National Eligibility Cum Common Entrance Test (`NEET-UG') examination.

       Though the petitioners have qualified the said test, their All India ranking appears to be quite low. Notwithstanding this ranking, the petitioners are hopeful of getting admission in minority institution run and administered by their community.

       Government of Kerala issued G.O. dated January 30, 2017, which carves out NK II (Non Keralite II) and makes them ineligible for admission to medical and allied courses, including MBBS/BDS. Petitioners contend that it is unconstitutional being discriminatory and violative of Articles 14 and 15 of the Constitution of India. However no such prayer is made in the writ petition and this document does not find a mention in the writ petition and not even filed along with the writ petition, but was filed as an additional document subsequent to the filing of the writ petition.

       Finding of the Court:

       The Writ petition is not maintainable.

       Result: Petition dismissed.

JUDGMENT

A.K. Sikri, J.

The petitioners herein, three in number, belong to Muslim minority community. They are, however, not residents of Kerala and their fixed abode is Tamil Nadu. They have appeared in the National Eligibility Cum Common Entrance Test (for short, `NEET-UG') examination, which is an All India examination for admission to various medical courses. Results of NEET-UG examination were published on June 23, 2017. Though the petitioners have qualified the said test, their All India ranking appears to be quite low. Notwithstanding this ranking, the petitioners are hopeful of getting admission in minority institution run and administered by their community, as they feel that because of the preference which can be given by the minority institutions to the persons belonging to their community, it provides a reasonable chance of getting admission to such colleges. Respondent Nos. 4 to 8 are the medical colleges run by the minority institutions. However, the petitioners feel their chances to get admission in any of the aforesaid colleges, i.e. respondent Nos. 4 to 8 which are situated in Kerala, are dented because of the undue preference given to those who are residents of Kerala. This mars the chances for getting admission in Kerala colleges as they are non-keralites being residents of Tamil Nadu.

2. In the writ petition reference is made to Ordinance No. 7 of 2017 known as "The Kerala Medical Education (Regulation and Control of Admission to Private Medical Educational Institutions) Ordinance of 2017", {Notification No. 4246/leg.H1/2017/LAW} which was promulgated on June 01, 2017 by the Governor of Kerala. This Ordinance provided for the regulation of admission and fixation of fee for private medical educational institutions in the State of Kerala and also for providing reservation of seats to persons belonging to the Schedules Castes, Scheduled Tribes and Other Backward Classes in medical/educational institutions. Section 10 of this Ordinance provided for reservation of seats. This provision reads as under:

"10. Reservation of seats. - In admission to private aided or unaided medical educational institutions, other than the minority educational institutions referred to in clause (1) of Article 30 of the Constitution of India, there shall be reservation at the stage of admission for the persons belonging to the Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes and Other Backward Classes of citizens as may be prescribed by the Government."

3. As per the aforesaid provision, reservation was made for persons belonging to Schedules Castes, Scheduled Tribes and Other Backward Classes. Further, persons belonging to these classes are not confined to the State of Kerala and all those who are citizens of India are qualified for such reservation. Further, the minority institutions governed by Article 30 of the Constitution of India are excluded from this provision, meaning thereby they are not supposed to make reservation for these classes as prescribed by the Government and they can have their own system of reservation, if any. Section 2(c) of this Ordinance defines `centralised counselling' as under:

"(c) "centralized counselling" means a common counselling and allotment of seats in colleges through a single window procedure by the Government or by any agency authorised by it for persons who have qualified in the entrance test for the purpose of merit based admission to medical colleges or institutions;"

4. Section 2(l) defines `minority' and Section 2(m) defines `minority institution'. Under Section 3 of the Ordinance, admission and fee regulatory committee is to be constituted by the Government by issuing notification in the Gazette. This committee is supposed to supervise and guide the admission process as well as fixation of fee which is to be charged from candidates seeking admission in various medical institutions. It is the say of the petitioners that provisions of this Ordinance reflected that the admission to medical colleges or institutio

























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top