SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(SC) 100

RANJAN GOGOI, R.BANUMATHI
SELVARAJ – Appellant
Versus
STATE BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE, TAMIL NADU – Respondent


ORDER

1. Fifteen (15) accused were sent for trial for commission of various offences including the offence punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (“IPC” for short) for the murder of one Umanath (deceased) which had occurred at about 10.45 p.m. on 10th March, 2007. The learned trial Court acquitted six (06) of the accused while convicting the remaining nine (09) accused. In appeal, the High Court set aside the conviction of five (05) of the accused while maintaining the same in respect of four (04) accused, namely, Accused No.1 – Ramanathan s/o Velu, Accused No.2 – Purushothaman s/o Mani Nathan, Accused No.3 – Selvaraj s/o Veerappan and Accused No.4 – Kalaimohan s/o Desingu. Aggrieved, Accused No.3 – Selvaraj s/o Veerappan and Accused No.4 – Kalaimohan s/o Desingu have filed the present appeal by special leave.

2. We have heard the learned counsels for the parties.

3. The prosecution examined a large number of witnesses as eye-witnesses to the occurrence, namely, Pandian (PW-1), Deivanayagam (PW-2), Karunakaran (PW-3), Suresh (PW-4), Punitha (PW-5), Kadal Dhanasekar (PW-6), Sundari (PW-7), Bhuvaneshwari (PW-8), Anandhi (PW-9), Jayalakshmi (PW-10), Tamilvanan (PW-1









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top