SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(SC) 829

ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN, INDU MALHOTRA
EMKAY GLOBAL FINANCIAL SERVICES LTD. – Appellant
Versus
GIRDHAR SONDHI – Respondent


JUDGMENT

R.F. NARIMAN, J.

1. Leave granted.

2. The present appeal arises out of a dispute between the Appellant, who is a registered broker with the National Stock Exchange, and the Respondent, its client, regarding certain transactions in securities and shares. The Respondent had initiated an arbitration proceeding against the Appellant, claiming an amount of Rs.7,36,620/-, which was rejected by the Sole Arbitrator vide an Arbitration Award dated 08.12.2009.

3. The appeal arises out of an agreement dated 03.07.2008, which contains the following clauses:

General Clause

1. The parties hereto agree to abide by the provisions of the Depositories Act, 1996, SEBI (Depositories and Participants) Regulation, 1996 Bye-Laws and Operating Instructions issued by CDSL from time to time in the same manner and to the same extent as if the same were set out herein and formed part of this Agreement.”

xxx xxx xxx

Arbitration

11. The parties hereto shall, in respect of all disputes and differences that may arise between them, abide by the provisions relating to arbitration and conciliation specified under the Bye-Laws.”

 xxx xxx xxx

Jurisdiction

12. The parties hereto agree to submit to the exclusi



































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top