Question 1? How to implement live streaming of Supreme Court proceedings while balancing open justice with privacy and fair trial concerns. Question 2? What is the scope and criteria for determining which cases are eligible for live streaming of court proceedings. Question 3? What are the regulatory framework and safeguards (including pilot phases, user rights, and judge's discretion) required to regulate live streaming in the Supreme Court of India?

Key Points: - The judgment endorses live streaming/open court concept and recommends a regulatory framework with rules under Article 145(1) (!) (!) (!) . - It emphasizes open justice and public access to proceedings, citing Article 21, Article 145, CrPC Section 327, CPC Section 153-B (!) (!) (!) . - It proposes a phased, pilot-based implementation with guidelines and strict safeguards to protect privacy and administration of justice (!) (!) (!) . - It sets out recommended categories to be excluded from live streaming (e.g., matrimonial, sexual assault, cases involving minors) and the presiding judge’s discretion to disallow in specific cases (!) (!) . - It calls for authoritative rules by the Supreme Court to regulate live streaming, including delays, room arrangements, and archival access, with Court retaining copyright and final say (!) (!) (!) (!) .

Question 1? How to implement live streaming of Supreme Court proceedings while balancing open justice with privacy and fair trial concerns.

Question 2? What is the scope and criteria for determining which cases are eligible for live streaming of court proceedings.

Question 3? What are the regulatory framework and safeguards (including pilot phases, user rights, and judge's discretion) required to regulate live streaming in the Supreme Court of India?