SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(SC) 1460

KURIAN JOSEPH, R.BANUMATHI
Amar Nath Neogi – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent


Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellants :Sachin Datta, Sr. Adv., P. Vinay Kumar, Ankur Goel, Manmilan Sidhu, Ms. Roopali Chaturvedi, Advocates.

JUDGMENT

Kurian, J.

Leave granted.

2. The appellant is an accused in Case No.680/2015 corresponding to G.R. No.4839/2015 under Sections 420, 467, 468 and 471 of the I.P.C. We are informed that the investigation has already been completed. We also found from the records that the appellant is a senior citizen, having crossed the age of 65 years. We are also informed that he was never in Government service. We fail to understand as to why the appellant prayed for anticipatory bail in a case where final report has been filed.

3. In the above circumstances, we dispose of this appeal as follows :

The appellant shall surrender before the Court of competent jurisdiction where the final report has been filed, within two weeks from today.

On such surrender, the appellant shall be released on bail on his executing a bond to the tune of Rs. 50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand) with two solvent sureties to the equal amount.

4. The appeal is, accordingly, disposed of.

5. Pending applications, if any, shall stand disposed of.

6. There shall be no orders as to costs.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top