SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(SC) 162

A.M.KHANWILKAR, AJAY RASTOGI
KRIPAL SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For Appellant(s) : Ms. Pratibha Jain, AOR
For Respondent(s): Ms. Ruchi Kohli, AOR

JUDGMENT

Rastogi, J.

1. This appeal has been filed against the judgment and order dated 4th February, 2008 passed by the High Court of Judicature of Rajasthan at Jaipur Bench confirming the conviction of the appellant for the offence punishable under Section 302 IPC passed by the learned trial Court under the impugned judgment dated 22nd November, 2002.

2. The brief facts as per the prosecution case are that on 28th July, 2001, at 9.15 p.m. informant Sunil Kumar Goyal(PW-13) submitted a written report(Exh. P-1) at Police Station Dug wherein it was stated that around 6.30 p.m., he was going along with his brother Yashwant and Paras Mal on motor cycle bearing no. R-J20 8M 9309 to their agricultural farm situated at village Doodhlai. Yashwant was on the driving seat, Paras Mal(PW-1) was in the middle and the informant Sunil Kumar Goyal(PW-13) was sitting on the rear seat. While they were returning back, the accused Kripal Singh along with Ramlal, Arjun Singh and Sultan Singh met them near the house of Dhoole Singh. All the four were armed with axe, lathi, dharia, sword and pharsa surrounded their motor cycle and exhorted to kill Yashwant. Informant Sunil Kumar Goyal(PW-13) and Paras Mal


































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top