L.NAGESWARA RAO, M.R.SHAH
Bikash Ranjan Rout – Appellant
Versus
State through the Secretary (Home), Government of NCT of Delhi – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
M.R. SHAH, J.
1. Leave granted.
2. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned judgment and order dated 20.08.2014 passed by the High Court of Delhi in Criminal M.C. No. 3386 of 2013 by which the High Court has dismissed the said petition and has confirmed the order passed by the learned Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate (West) Delhi dated 05.02.2013, by which the learned Magistrate ordered further investigation, the original accused has preferred the present appeal.
3. That the FIR was lodged against the appellant herein-original accused on 28.09.2007 being FIR No. 426/2007 at Police Station Janakpuri, Delhi for the offences under Sections 420, 468 and 471 of the IPC. That on completion of the investigation, the investigating officer filed the chargesheet against the accused-appellant for the offences under Sections 420, 468 and 471 of the IPC. That at the time of framing of the charge and considering the chargesheet papers, the learned Magistrate discharged the appellant-original accused vide order dated 05.02.2013. However, while discharging the accused and/or after the accused was discharged, in the same order, the learned Magistrate directed the Addition
Bhagwant Singh v. Commissioner of Police
Reeta Nag v. State of West Bengal
Vinay Tyagi v. Irshad Ali @ Deepak
Vasanti Dubey v. State of Madhya Pradesh
Randhir Singh Rana v. State (Delhi Administration)
Kishan Lal v. Dharmendra Bafna
Hemant Dhasmana v. Central Bureau of Investigation
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.