Key Points: - Minor discrepancies and inconsistent versions in witness testimony, if credibly found, are not fatal to the prosecution. (!) (!) - A witness cannot be disbelieved solely for partisan relation to the deceased or prosecution, if found trustworthy. (!) - Medical evidence is expert opinion and corroborative; it cannot override ocular evidence where consistent. (!) - Plausible delay in lodging FIR or in production before Magistrate is not fatal if plausibly explained. (!) (!) - Recovery of weapons can be proved by investigating officer’s testimony even if Panch witnesses turn hostile. (!) (!) - Investigation can be conducted by PSI in absence of Circle Inspector; lack of Circle Inspector authority is not fatal. (!) - Overt acts attributed to accused not corroborated by medical evidence may justify acquittal for that accused. (!) (!) - Delays in FIR/receipt of FIR explained plausibly may not affect prosecution’s case. (!) (!) - Credibility of PW-5 as natural, illiterate eye-witness and mother of the deceased supported by corroborative materials. (!) (!)

What is the admissibility and consideration of minor discrepancies in witness testimony in a criminal murder trial?

What is the effect of delays in lodging and transmitting FIRs on the credibility of the prosecution case?

What is the validity and weight of medical expert testimony in relation to ocular evidence in establishing cause and manner of death?