SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(SC) 1419

DEEPAK GUPTA, ANIRUDDHA BOSE
Mohinder Singh – Appellant
Versus
Jaswant Kaur (D) through LRs. – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellants : Mr. Amrit Pal Singh Dhaliwal, Mr. Kuldip Singh.
For the Respondents: Mr. Rajat Bhardwaj, Mr. Gaurav Kumar.

ORDER :

1. This appeal is directed against the judgment dated 15.01.2009 passed by the Punjab and Haryana High Court dismissing the appeal holding that there is no substantial question of law involved. The High Court held that a carbon copy of a document which carbon copy is signed by both the parties cannot be termed as an original document under Section 62 of the Evidence Act. This finding of the High Court is absolutely incorrect and against the provision of Section 62 of the Evidence Act. This carbon copy was prepared in the same process as the original document and once it is signed by both the parties, it assumes the character of the original document.

2. On this short ground, we allow this appeal and remit the matter to the High Court. We make it clear that we have not expressed any opinion on the merits of the dispute. It is for the High Court to decide whether any substantial questions of law arises and the appellant before us is entitled to any relief or not. With these observations, the civil appeal is disposed of. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top