SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(SC) 1673

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
KURIAN JOSEPH, MOHAN M. SHANTANAGOUDAR, JJ.
Bajaj Alliance General Insurance Co. Ltd – Appellant
Versus
Rambha Devi and Others – Respondents
Civil Appeal No. 841 of 2018
Decided On : 03-05-2018

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
Mr. Joy Basu, Mr. Jayant Bhushan, Mr. Sukant Vikram, Mr. Abhinav Ankit, Mr. Sandeep Jha, Mr. Ram Ekbal Roy, Mr. Binay Kumar Das, Ms. Archana Pathak Dave, Mr. A. Krishnaswamy, Ms. Ankita Choudhary, Mr. Utsav, Mr. Sanyat Lodha, Mr. Devanshu Sajlan, Mr. Anurag Rana, Ms. Viddusshi, Ms. Shalini Kaul, Mr. Prakash Ranjan Nayak, Mr. Nishanth Patil, Ms. Sneha R. Iyer, Mr. Sudhir Naagar.

The entitlement of a person licensed to drive a light motor vehicle to drive a transport vehicle in that category should be considered by a larger Bench of 3 Judges in light of certain distinct provisions pertaining specifically to transport vehicles.

Headnote:

DRIVING LICENCE - TRANSPORT VEHICLE - The court considered whether a person licensed to drive a light motor vehicle is entitled to drive a transport vehicle in that category. The court referred to the conclusions in Mukund Dewangan vs. Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. and directed the matter to be considered by a larger Bench of 3 Judges.

Fact of the Case:

The court considered the question of whether a person licensed to drive a light motor vehicle is ipso facto entitled to drive a transport vehicle in that category. The issue was referred to the conclusions in Mukund Dewangan vs. Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. and directed the matter to be considered by a larger Bench of 3 Judges.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the matter should be considered by a larger Bench of 3 Judges in light of certain distinct provisions pertaining specifically to transport vehicles that were not brought to the notice of the Court.

Issues: The issues included the entitlement of a person licensed to drive a light motor vehicle to drive a transport vehicle in that category, and the consideration of certain distinct provisions pertaining specifically to transport vehicles.

Ratio Decidendi: The court directed the matter to be considered by a larger Bench of 3 Judges in light of certain distinct provisions pertaining specifically to transport vehicles that were not brought to the notice of the Court.

Final Decision: The court directed the Registry to place the papers before Hon'ble the Chief Justice of India for appropriate orders.

ORDER :

1. Whether a person licensed to drive a light motor vehicle is ipso facto entitled to drive a transport vehicle in that category, is the question to be considered in these cases. We find that the issue has been considered by this Court by a Bench of three Judges in Mukund Dewangan vs. Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. (2017) 14 SCC 663.

2. The conclusions in Mukund Dewangan (supra), as summarised by the Court, read as follows:

    “60. Thus, we answer the questions which are referred to us thus:

    60.1. “Light motor vehicle” as defined in Section 2(21) of the Act would include a transport vehicle as per the weight prescribed in Section 2(21) read with Sections 2(15) and 2(48). Such transport vehicles are not excluded from the definition of the light motor vehicle by virtue of Amendment Act 54 of 1994.

    60.2. A transport vehicle and omnibus, the gross vehicle weight of either of which does not exceed 7500 kg would be a light motor vehicle and also motor car or tractor or a road-roller, “un-laden weight” of which does not exceed 7500 kg and holder of a driving licence to drive class of “light motor vehicle” as provided in Section 10(2) (d) is competent to drive a transport vehicle or omnibus, the gross vehicle weight of which does not exceed 7500 kg or a motor car or tractor or road-roller, the “un-laden weight” of which does not exceed 7500 kg. That is to say, no separate endorsement on the licence is required to drive a transport vehicle of light motor vehicle class as enumerated above. A licence issued under Section 10(2)(d) continues to be valid after Amendment Act 54 of 1994 and 28-3-2001 in the form.

    60.3. The effect of the amendment made by virtue of Act 54 of 1994 w.e.f. 14-11-1994 while substituting clauses (e) to (h) of Section 10(2) which contained “medium goods vehicle” in Section 10(2)(e) “medium passenger motor vehicle” in Section 10(2) (f), “heavy goods vehicle” in Section 10(2) (g) and “heavy passenger motor vehicle” in Section 10(2)(h) with expression “transport vehicle” as substituted in Section 10(2)(e) related only to the aforesaid substituted classes only. It does not exclude transport vehicle, from the purview of Section 10(2) (d) and Section 2(41) of the Act i.e. light motor vehicle.

    60.4. The effect of amendment of Form 4 by insertion of “transport vehicle” is related only to the categories which were substituted in the year 1994 and the procedure to obtain driving licence for transport vehicle of class of “light motor vehicle” continues to be the same as it was and has not been changed and there is no requirement to obtain separate endorsement to drive transport vehicle, and if a driver is holding licence to drive light motor vehicle, he can drive transport vehicle of such class without any endorsement to that effect.”

    (Emphasis supplied)

3. It is the submission of Shri Jayant Bhushan and Shri Joy Basu, learned senior counsel that certain distinct provisions pertaining specifically to transport vehicles have unfortunately not been brought to the notice of the Court:

    (1) Section 4(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act”) provides that the minimum age of holding a driving licence for a motor vehicle is 18 years. Section 4(2) provides that no person under the age of 20 years shall drive a transport vehicle in a public place.

    (2) Section 7 provides that no person can be granted a learner's licence to drive a transport vehicle unless he has held a driving licence to drive a light motor vehicle for at least one year.

    (3) Section 14 deals with the currency of licence to drive motor vehicles. A driving licence issued or renewed under this Act, in case a licence to drive a transport vehicle will be effective for a period of three years. The proviso to Section 14(2)(a) provides that in case of a licence to drive a transport vehicle carrying goods of dangerous or hazardous nature, it shall be effective for a period of one year. However, in case of any other licence, it would be effective for a p

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top