Back
J.CHELAMESWAR, SANJAY KISHAN KAUL
High Court Of Judicature Of Hyderabad For High Court Of Telangana And Andhra Pradesh – Appellant
Versus
Mahabunisa Begum – Respondent
ORDER
1. Learned counsel appearing for both the parties in the matter submit that the impugned order cannot be sustained in view of the scheme provided in the proviso to Section 24(8) of the Cr.PC and in light of the decision of this Court in Shiv Kumar v. Hukam Chand & Anr. (1999) 7 SCC 467 and Dhariwal Industries Ltd. v. Kishore Wadhwani & Ors. 2016 (4) Law Herald (SC) 2725 : 2016 (5) Law Herald (P & H) 4020 (SC) : 2016 Law Herald. Org 1731 : (2016) 10 SCC 378 .
2. The impugned judgment is accordingly set aside in light of the aforementioned decisions.
3. The special leave petition is disposed of.
4. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
