SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(SC) 1732

K.G.BALAKRISHNAN, TARUN CHATTERJEE
Prithviraj (Dead) By Lrs. – Appellant
Versus
Collector, Land Acquisition, H. P. – Respondent


ORDER :

K.G. Balakrishnan, J.

Leave granted.

2. Heard both sides.

3. By the impugned judgment, the High Court declined to implead the legal heirs of the original claimant in the pending proceedings. The petitioner widow submits that she was not aware of the pending proceedings, so she could not take any steps to this effect. The petitioner is permitted to implead/substitute the legal heirs of deceased Prithvi Raj in the appeal filed by the original claimant. We direct restoration of the case to the file of the High Court and we request the High Court to dispose of the same in accordance with law. We are told that the deceased Prithvi Raj has a living son. The present appellant shall take steps to implead the son also in the proceedings.

4. The appeal is disposed of as above.

5. No costs.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top